Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNT POLICIES

v3.10.0.1
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNT POLICIES
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2018
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNT POLICIES

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNT POLICIES

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our wholly owned subsidiary, Ondas Networks Inc. All intercompany transaction and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Segment Information

 

We operate in one business segment, which is the development, marketing and sale of wireless radio systems for secure, wide area mission-critical business-to-business networks.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Such management estimates include those relating to revenue recognition, inventory write-downs to reflect net realizable value, assumptions used in the valuation of stock-based awards and warrants, and valuation allowances against deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

We consider all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less, as well as deposits in financial institutions, to be cash and cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had no cash equivalents.

 

Trade Accounts Receivable

 

Accounts receivable are stated at a gross invoice amount less an allowance for doubtful accounts. We estimate allowance for doubtful accounts by evaluating specific accounts where information indicates our customers may have an inability to meet financial obligations, such as customer payment history, credit worthiness and receivable amounts outstanding for an extended period beyond contractual terms. We use assumptions and judgment, based on the best available facts and circumstances, to record an allowance to reduce the receivable to the amount expected to be collected. These allowances are evaluated and adjusted as additional information is received.

 

We had no allowance for doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2018 and an allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,914 as of December 31, 2017.

 

Inventory

 

Inventories, which consist solely of equipment components, are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value, net of reserves for obsolete inventory. We continually analyze our slow-moving and excess inventories. Based on historical and projected sales volumes and anticipated selling prices, we established reserves. Inventory that is in excess of current and projected use is reduced by an allowance to a level that approximates its estimate of future demand. Products that are determined to be obsolete are written down to net realizable value. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we determined that no such reserves were necessary.

 

Property and Equipment

 

All additions, including improvements to existing facilities, are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is principally recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives typically are (i) three years for equipment and software, and (ii) seven years for furniture and fixtures. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. Upon the disposal of property, the asset and related accumulated depreciation accounts are relieved of the amounts recorded therein for such items, and any resulting gain or loss is recorded in operating expenses in the year of disposition.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

Long-lived assets are evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed. Such indicators include significant technological changes, adverse changes in market conditions and/or poor operating results. The carrying value of a long-lived asset group is considered impaired when the projected undiscounted future cash flows is less than its carrying value. The amount of impairment loss recognized is the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of the asset or asset group. Fair market value is determined primarily using the projected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Based upon our evaluation, there were no impairments of long-lived assets required during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

 

Research and Development

 

Research and development expenses are charged to operations as incurred. For internally developed patents, all patent application costs are expensed as incurred as research and development expense. Patent application costs, generally legal costs, are expensed as research and development costs until such time as the future economic benefits of such patents become more certain.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

 

Derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and changes in fair value are recorded in earnings at each reporting date in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Our financial instruments consist primarily of receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses and short and long-term debt. The carrying amount of receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates our fair value because of the short-term maturity of such instruments. We have elected not to carry our debt instruments at fair value. The carrying amount of our debt approximates fair value. Interest rates that are currently available to us for issuance of short and long-term debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of our short and long-term debt.

 

We have categorized our assets and liabilities that are valued at fair value on a recurring basis into a three-level fair value hierarchy in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).

 

Assets and liabilities recorded in the balance sheets at fair value are categorized based on a hierarchy of inputs, as follows:

 

Level 1 -- Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 -- Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 -- Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

 

In accordance with accounting standards, we determined that certain instruments qualified as derivative liabilities and should be recorded at their fair value on the date of issuance and re-measured at fair value each reporting period with the change reported in earnings). The fair value of these instruments were computed using the Binomial Lattice Monte Carlo model, incorporating transaction details such as the price of our common stock, contractual terms, maturity and risk-free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior.

 

The assumptions used in computing the fair value as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are as follows:

 

    September 30,
2018
    December 31,
2017
 
Stock price   $ 0.2281     $ 0.0027  
Conversion price   $ 8.1500     $ 8.1500  
Expected volatility     63.0 %     60.0 %
Term (years)     9.5       8.5  
Risk-free interest     2.36 %     3.03 %
Expected dividend yield     0 %     0 %

 

The following table provides the financial assets and liabilities reported at fair value and measured on a recurring basis at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

 

Description     Assets/
(Liabilities)
Measured at Fair Value
    Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
    Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
                           
Fair value of warrant liability as of:                          
                           
September 30, 2018     $     $     $     $  
                           
December 31, 2017     $ (166,093 )   $     $     $ (166,093 )

 

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value associated with the Level 3 liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017:

 

     

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

 
     

September 30,

2018

     

December 31,

2017

 
                 
Balance, beginning of period   $ (166,093 )   $  
Issuances of derivative liability     (623,875 )     (171,118 )
Reclassification to additional paid in capital     1,742,939        
Change in fair value of derivative liability     (952,971 )     5,025  
Balance, end of period   $     $ (166,093 )

 

The above table of Level 3 liabilities begins with the prior period balance and adjusts the balance for changes that occurred during the current period. The ending balance of the Level 3 financial instrument presented above represent our best estimates and may not be substantiated by comparisons to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instruments.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

We generate revenue primarily from the sale of the FullMAX System and our warranty/maintenance program. In accordance with ASC 606, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled to receive in exchange for these goods or services. The provisions of ASC 606 include a five-step process by which we determine revenue recognition, depicting the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts reflecting the payment to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASC 606 requires us to apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract with the customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, we satisfy the performance obligation.

 

Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for transferring products or services to a customer. To the extent the transaction price includes variable consideration, we estimate the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing the expected value method to which it expects to be entitled. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if, in our judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur. Estimates of variable consideration and determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based largely on an assessment of our anticipated performance and all information (historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available. Sales, value add, and other taxes collected on behalf of third parties are excluded from revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2108, none of our contracts with customers included variable consideration.

 

Contracts that are modified to account for changes in contract specifications and requirements are assessed to determine if the modification either creates new or changes the existing enforceable rights and obligations. Generally, contract modifications are for products or services that are not distinct from the existing contract due to the inability to use, consume or sell the products or services on their own to generate economic benefits and are accounted for as if they were part of that existing contract. The effect of a contract modification on the transaction price and measure of progress for the performance obligation to which it relates, is recognized as an adjustment to revenue (either as an increase in or a reduction of revenue) on a cumulative catch-up basis. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2108, there were no modification to contract specifications.

 

Revenue is generally recognized when the customer obtains control of our product, which occurs at a point in time, and may be upon shipment or upon delivery based on the contractual shipping terms of a contract, or upon installation when the combined performance obligation is not distinct within the context of the contract. Service revenue is generally recognized over time as the services are delivered to the customer based on the extent of progress towards completion of the performance obligation. The selection of the method to measure progress towards completion requires judgment and is based on the nature of the products or services to be provided. Services are expected to be delivered to the customer throughout the term of the contract and we believe recognizing revenue ratably over the term of the contract best depicts the transfer of value to the customer.

 

If the contract contains a single performance obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation. We enter into certain contracts that have multiple performance obligations, one or more of which may be delivered subsequent to the delivery of other performance obligations. These performance obligations may include installation, training, maintenance and support services. We allocate the transaction price based on the estimated relative standalone selling prices of the promised products or services underlying each performance obligation. We determine standalone selling prices based on the price at which the performance obligation is sold separately. If the standalone selling price is not observable through past transactions, we estimate the standalone selling price considering available information such as market conditions and internally approved pricing guidelines related to the performance obligations. Revenue is then allocated to the performance obligations using the relative selling prices of each of the performance obligations in the contract.

 

For all performance obligations, we determine the revenue for each deliverable based on its relative selling price in the contract and recognizes revenue upon delivery of the product or service, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Revenue for equipment is recognized when the equipment has been delivered, and installation and training have been completed. Revenue for warranty, maintenance and support services is recognized ratably over the term of the service contract.

 

Contract Liabilities

 

Our contract liabilities consist of billings in excess of revenue recognized. We classify deferred revenue as current or noncurrent based on the timing of when it expects to recognize revenue. In order to determine revenue recognized in the period from contract liabilities, we first allocate revenue to the individual contract liability balance outstanding at the beginning of the period until the revenue exceeds that balance.

 

Our contract liabilities consist of billings in excess of revenue recognized. We classify deferred revenue as current or noncurrent based on the timing of when it expects to recognize revenue. In order to determine revenue recognized in the period from contract liabilities, we first allocate revenue to the individual contract liability balance outstanding at the beginning of the period until the revenue exceeds that balance.

 

The table below details the activity in these deferred warranty and maintenance programs during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017, and the balance at the end of each period is included as deferred revenue in the table in NOTE 6 below.

 

    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2018
    Year
Ended December 31, 2017
 
Balance, beginning of period   $ 30,690     $ 36,299  
Additions     20,106       39,895  
Transfer to revenue     (38,824 )     (45,504 )
Balance, end of period   $ 11,972     $ 30,690  

 

Disaggregation of Revenue

 

Our products consist of our software defined base station and remote radios and our network management and monitoring system (“NMS”). We sell our products through our direct sales force. We also allow for 12-month warranties to be purchased on our products. Warranty sales are deferred upon sale of our wireless communications products, to be recognized ratably over the 12-month warranty period following the date of the related equipment sale. Our warranty includes 1) factory hardware repair or replacement, at our election, of the base station and remote radios, 2) software upgrades, bug fixes and new features of the radio software and NMS, 3) deployment and network architecture support and 4) technical support by phone and email. After 12 months, in order to maintain their hardware and software, customers can purchase an annual maintenance program, which is recognized ratably over the 12-month period following the date of purchase. We also provide ancillary services directly related to the sale of our wireless communications products including wireless network design, systems engineering, radio frequency planning, software configuration, product training and onsite support.

 

The following table summarizes revenue by revenue source for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2018:

 

    Three Months
Ended
    Nine Months
Ended
 
    September 30, 2018  
Major Products/Services                
     Product revenue   $ 23,323     $ 33,901  
     Service revenue     11,853       49,279  
Total   $ 35,176     $ 83,180  
             
Timing of Revenue Recognition            
     Products transferred at a point in time   $ 28,310     $ 44,356  
     Services transferred over time     6,866       38,824  
Total   $ 35,176     $ 83,180  

 

Net Loss Per Common Share

 

Net loss per share for all periods presented is based on the equity structure of the legal acquirer, which assumes common stock is outstanding and is reflected on a retrospective basis for all periods presented. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for each period. Diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share since the Company has net losses for each period presented. The following common stock equivalents were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share for the periods indicated because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect:

 

Potentially dilutive securities outlined in the table below have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share because the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

 

    For the Nine Months
Ended September 30,
 
    2018     2017  
Warrants to purchase common stock           2,630,606  
Options to purchase common stock           3,606,052  
Convertible debt     140,678       1,093,153  
Total potentially dilutive securities     140,678       7,329,811  

 

Debt Issuance Costs

 

Debt issuance costs represent costs incurred for the issuance of debt. Once the associated debt instrument is issued, these costs would be recorded as a debt discount and amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the related debt instrument. Upon abandonment of a pending financing transaction, the related deferred financing costs are charged to interest expense.

 

Concentrations of Credit Risk

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and accounts receivable. Cash is deposited with a limited number of financial institutions. The balances held at any one financial institution may be in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance limits.

 

Credit is extended to customers based on an evaluation of their financial condition and other factors. We generally do not require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts and sales credits.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”), 2018-13 that eliminates certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements for all entities, requires public entities to disclose certain new information and modifies some disclosure requirements. The FASB developed the amendments to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 as part of its broader disclosure framework project, which aims to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to financial statements by focusing on requirements that clearly communicate the most important information to users of the financial statements. The new guidance is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity is permitted to early adopt either the entire standard or only the provisions that eliminate or modify requirements. We are currently evaluating the effect of this guidance on our disclosures.

 

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2018-07”). The amendments in ASU 2018-07 expand the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. ASU 2018-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2018-07 on our financial statements.

 

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11 (“ASU 2017-11”), Earnings Per Share (“Topic 260”), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“Topic 480”), and Derivatives and Hedging (“Topic 815”). ASU 2017-11 is intended to simplify the accounting for financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. Among the issues addressed are: (i) determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock; (ii) distinguishing liabilities from equity for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities; and (iii) identifying mandatorily redeemable non-controlling interests. ASU 2017-11 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2019. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2017-11 on our financial statements.

 

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 is intended to reduce the diversity in practice regarding how certain transactions are classified within the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 became effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. There was no material effect on our 2018 financial statements upon adoption.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). This guidance simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions for both public and nonpublic entities, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The guidance became effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption was permitted in any annual or interim period for which financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance, but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. If an entity early adopts the guidance in an interim period, any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. There was no material effect on our2018 financial statements upon adoption.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases – Targeted Improvements, to provide another transition method, allowing a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings during the period of adoption. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We plan to adopt the guidance on January 1, 2019. We are in the process of reviewing our lease agreements and evaluating the impact of this guidance on our financial statements. We anticipate recording additional assets and corresponding liabilities on our balance sheets related to operating leases within our lease portfolio upon adoption of this guidance.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  In doing so, companies will need to use more judgment and make more estimates than under previous guidance. These may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. In July 2015, the FASB approved the proposal to defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 standard by one year. Early adoption was permitted after December 15, 2016, and the standard became effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods therein. In 2016, the FASB issued final amendments to clarify the implementation guidance for principal versus agent considerations (ASU 2016-08), accounting for licenses of intellectual property and identifying performance obligations (ASU 2016-10), narrow-scope improvements and practical expedients (ASU 2016-12) and technical corrections and improvements to Topic 606 (ASU 2016-20) in its new revenue standard. We adopted this update on January 1, 2018 and the adoption had no material impact to our financial statements.